How We Calculate Calories Burned

Scientific methodology using peer-reviewed MET values from the 2024 Compendium of Physical Activities

1,100+

Activities with catalogued MET values (900+ measured)

±15-20%

Typical accuracy for average-weight adults

2024

Latest Compendium data

What is a MET Value?

MET stands for Metabolic Equivalent of Task – a standardized measure of energy expenditure during physical activities.

1 MET = 3.5 mL of oxygen per kg of body weight per minute

This represents the energy your body uses while sitting quietly at rest.

An activity with a MET value of 5 means you burn 5 times more energy doing it than at rest. Walking at 3 mph has a MET of ~3.5, while running at 6 mph has a MET of ~10.

The Calorie Burn Formula

Scientific Formula

Calories = (MET × 3.5 × Weightkg) ÷ 200 × Durationmin

MET

Activity intensity

3.5

O₂ consumption constant

Weight

Your body weight (kg)

Duration

Exercise time (min)

Example Calculation:

Activity: Running at 6 mph (MET = 10.0)

Weight: 70 kg (154 lbs)

Duration: 30 minutes

Calculation: (10.0 × 3.5 × 70) ÷ 200 × 30 = 367 calories

MET Intensity Categories

🍃

Light Intensity

1.6 - 2.9 METs

Slow walking, light chores, stretching

🚶

Moderate Intensity

3.0 - 5.9 METs

Brisk walking, cycling, water aerobics

🏃

Vigorous Intensity

6.0 - 8.9 METs

Running, swimming laps, aerobics

Very Vigorous Intensity

≥ 9.0 METs

Sprinting, competitive sports, HIIT

Peer-Reviewed Scientific Research

Our calculator is built on decades of rigorous scientific research. Here are the key studies that validate MET-based calorie calculations:

Metabolic Equivalents (METS) in Exercise Testing and Prescription

Jetté M, Sidney K, Blümchen GClinical Cardiology, 1990

Established the MET concept as a standardized method for quantifying physical activity energy cost.

Read Study

2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities

Ainsworth BE et al.Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 2024

The third major update to the Compendium, cataloguing 1,114 physical activities (912 with measured MET values) based on a systematic review of 701 research papers.

Read Study

Energy Expenditure of Walking and Running

Various research teamsMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Validated MET-based prediction equations for walking and running with approximately ±15% accuracy for average-weight adults.

Read Study

How Accurate Is This Calculator?

  • MET-based calculations are typically accurate within ±15-20% for adults of average body composition doing well-studied activities like walking and running
  • Accuracy improves when you input your actual weight, age, gender, and exercise duration
  • Results may vary more for individuals who are significantly overweight, very lean, or highly trained
  • For the highest accuracy, provide your average heart rate — our Keytel formula uses it for a more individualized estimate
Manish Kumar

Written & Reviewed By

Manish Kumar

NASM-Certified Personal Trainer • 10+ Years Experience